VMware to Azure migration is the planned re-platforming of vSphere workloads onto Microsoft Azure — typically driven by Broadcom's 2024 acquisition, 10x licensing increases, or end-of-support timelines. GR IT Services runs the discovery, builds a TCO model that includes Azure VMware Solution vs Azure native rehost, rehearses the cutover, and delivers under a written SLA.

Inventory every VM, application, network dependency, and storage workload. Output: a written assessment with risk-flagged migration waves and a cost-to-migrate range.
Model your current VMware spend against AVS, native Azure rehost, and stay-on-VMware scenarios over 1, 3, and 5 years. Output: a board-ready TCO comparison and licence-rationalisation plan.
For workloads that benefit from minimal re-engineering: AVS gives you a vSphere environment inside Azure with VMware tools intact. We provision, configure, and govern.
For workloads ready to leave VMware: Azure Migrate-driven rehost to Azure IaaS with right-sized VMs, managed disks, and modernisation candidates flagged for phase 2.
Azure Virtual Network, ExpressRoute, Azure Firewall, NSGs, application gateways. Lift the NSX rules from on-prem into Azure-native policy where appropriate.
vSAN, VVOLs, NFS shares mapped to Azure Managed Disks, Azure NetApp Files, or Blob storage with cool/archive tiers. Latency-sensitive workloads kept on Premium SSD v2.
Entra ID integration, Azure RBAC role design, Azure Policy guard-rails, Defender for Cloud baselines. Day-1 governance, not bolted on later.
Wave-based cutovers, Azure Site Recovery replication, dress rehearsals, and a rollback plan. Production cutovers run with senior engineers on-call.
FinOps tagging, right-sizing reviews, Reserved Instance / Savings Plan strategy, Hybrid Benefit application, autoscale design. 25-40% cost cuts in the 90 days after cutover.
Pattern recognition matters. We have seen the application portfolios, the storage anti-patterns, the network-dependency surprises. We tell you what is hard to migrate before the project ramps.
Most VMware-exit projects fail at the budget stage. We model AVS vs native rehost vs stay-on-VMware before you commit; the TCO model survives leadership change because it is a written artefact.
Azure-certified engineers (AZ-104, AZ-305, AZ-700) on the US delivery bench. ExpressRoute, AVS, and Azure Migrate hands-on, not just slide-deck familiarity.
We document what we change, where data lands, and what the rollback path is. If the cutover wave goes wrong at 02:30, the rollback is in the runbook, signed off in advance.
Mid-market banks, broker-dealers, and asset managers running 200-2,000 VMs facing 3-5x VMware renewal quotes. AVS for regulated workloads, native rehost for the rest.
Hospital systems and biotech with EHR, PACS, and lab-informatics workloads. HIPAA-compliant migration paths with PHI sensitivity preserved through cutover.
Law firms, accountancies, consultancies running practice-management and document systems on VMware. Often paired with an M365 SharePoint migration in the same programme.
Mid-market manufacturers running ERP (SAP, Oracle, Dynamics 365 FO), MES, and warehouse-management on VMware. OT/IT segmentation preserved through migration.
Retailers and hospitality groups running POS back-of-house, inventory, and CRM systems on VMware across many sites. Centralisation to Azure with edge gateways.
SaaS companies migrating multi-tenant workloads off VMware to Azure-native (AKS, App Service, Cosmos DB) to escape VMware costs and gain platform-engineering velocity.
| Feature | Stay on VMware Renew with Broadcom | Azure VMware Solution (AVS) vSphere on Azure | Azure-native rehost IaaS / PaaS |
|---|---|---|---|
Re-engineering required | None | Minimal | Moderate |
Time to first workload | 0 (already running) | 4-8 weeks | 8-16 weeks |
Licence cost trajectory | Rising 2-5x at renewal | Microsoft-bundled, predictable | Pay-as-you-go + RI savings |
Best for workloads | Frozen / no roadmap | Lift-and-shift, low-touch | Cloud-native candidates |
VMware tools / NSX / vSAN | Native | Native (Microsoft-managed) | Replaced with Azure equivalents |
Modernisation runway | Limited | Good | Excellent |
Operating-model change | None | Minimal | Significant |
Typical 3-year TCO vs status quo | Baseline | −20 to −40% | −40 to −60% |
3-5 weeks
Inventory every VM, application, and dependency. Build the TCO model: AVS vs native vs stay-on-VMware. Output: written assessment, target-state architecture, board-ready cost-and-risk case.
3-5 weeks
Azure landing zone, network architecture (ExpressRoute or VPN), identity integration, governance baselines, monitoring and backup tooling. AVS clusters or AKS provisioning where required.
8-24 weeks
Migrate in 4-12 workload waves grouped by application affinity. Azure Site Recovery or Azure Migrate replication per workload. Cutover rehearsals before every production wave.
4 weeks
Senior engineers on-call for the four weeks after final cutover. P1 incident SLA cut to 5 minutes. Daily check-ins until incident volume normalises.
Continuous
FinOps tagging review, right-sizing, RI/Savings Plan strategy, Hybrid Benefit application. Handover to your team or transition into our managed Azure operations.
“Broadcom's renewal quote came in at 4.2x our previous VMware spend. We had 280 VMs across two datacentres and 60 days to decide. GR IT built the TCO model in three weeks, recommended AVS for 80 VMs of latency-sensitive workloads and native Azure rehost for the rest. We finished migration in six months and our year-2 run-rate is 31% below the old VMware baseline.”
Our general-purpose multi-cloud migration pillar covering AWS and GCP alongside Azure.
Learn moreOngoing operations of your post-migration Azure estate: monitoring, optimization, governance.
Learn moreAzure-native DR designs (Azure Site Recovery + Azure Backup) for post-migration resilience.
Learn moreSixty-minute discovery call. Output: an initial TCO range, AVS-vs-native recommendation, and engagement scope. No obligation.