You do not have to switch anything to start getting value from Intune.
Both management authorities can run on the same Windows machine simultaneously. The documentation is explicit that moving a workload is optional, and that simply enrolling your existing clients gives you Conditional Access with device compliance, remote actions and Autopilot provisioning straight away. Workloads move afterward, individually, each one piloted first. Understand it that way and a migration that has been eighteen months out for the last five years becomes a sequence that actually reaches an end.

- Seven workloadsMoved individually, when you are ready
- Zero requiredImmediate value without switching any
- Pilot firstTest each workload on a subset of devices
- Both at onceConfigMgr keeps everything you do not move
This is not a migration with a cutover date.
Ask why so many Configuration Manager estates have sat unmigrated for half a decade and the answer is always the same: everybody pictures one enormous move. What was actually designed is the precise opposite of that.
- Enrolling the clients you already have delivers capability on day one without touching a workload. Conditional Access backed by compliance, remote actions including restart, remote control and factory reset, centralized health visibility, modern provisioning. For a lot of organizations that list alone justifies the first phase without any further argument.
- After that, each of the seven moves on whatever schedule suits you, and everything left behind carries on being managed exactly as before. There is no moment where you must commit to the whole program, and no moment where the old platform stops working because the new one started.
- Any workload can be piloted against a separate collection before a larger group sees it. So every step gets tested on people who will actually tell you when something broke, and every step is reversible in practice rather than merely in the design document.
- Put those together and this becomes a run of contained changes spread across quarters, slotted around whatever else your team is committed to. Not a project requiring a window, a change freeze, and a rollback plan that nobody in the room genuinely believes would work.
Eight things about the migration that change how the project should run.
You get value before moving a single workload
Enroll your existing clients and a list of capabilities arrives immediately: Conditional Access backed by device compliance, remote actions covering restart, remote control and factory reset, centralized visibility of device health, users and devices and applications linked through the directory, and modern provisioning. Not one item on that list requires you to switch a single workload authority first.
Seven workloads, moved individually
The set covers compliance, Windows Update, resource access, endpoint protection, device configuration, Office Click-to-Run applications and general client applications. You are under no obligation to switch any of them, and you may move them one at a time whenever you are ready. Whatever stays behind carries on being managed exactly as it is today, alongside everything co-management does not touch at all.
Pilot each workload on a subset before committing
Each workload can be piloted against a separate collection, so the new functionality gets exercised on a manageable subset well before a larger population sees it. That capability, available per workload rather than once for the project, is what converts this into a series of reversible steps instead of one high-stakes cutover. It is also why these engagements can proceed without imposing a change freeze on anybody.
Two paths in, depending on where the device came from
Existing clients take one route: establish hybrid identity, then enroll them. Brand new internet-connected machines take the other: they join the directory, enroll automatically, and you add the Configuration Manager client afterward to reach the same co-managed state. Nearly every organization ends up running both paths at once, which is perfectly fine and considerably smoother when it was planned rather than discovered.
This is not the same as hybrid join, and Microsoft says so
The documentation addresses this head on: one is a management option, the other an identity option, and customers conflate them constantly. The two interact, certainly, but they are not the same decision and cannot be settled together. Establishing which of the two questions somebody is actually asking tends to clear up half the confusion inside the first workshop.
The device identity requirement, which excludes one common state
Machines have to be genuinely connected to the directory, meaning either hybrid joined or fully joined. Anything merely registered, the state often called workplace joined, is explicitly unsupported here. Go and find that population now. Discovering it during your first pilot, with an audience watching, is a considerably less pleasant way to learn the same fact.
It does not solve remote Configuration Manager clients
The guidance is unambiguous that this is not, by itself, an answer for remotely connected Windows machines, because the client still has to reach its assigned site whatever else is true. A cloud management gateway is what addresses that. Note also that neither requires the other: you can have a gateway without co-management and co-management without a gateway, though they do complement each other well.
Co-management, not coexistence, and the difference matters
A distinction is drawn between the two. Running Configuration Manager alongside a third-party mobile device management service is coexistence, not co-management, and the difference is functional rather than semantic: the two Microsoft platforms balance workloads between themselves to avoid conflicts, and third-party services do not participate in that. So coexistence carries real limitations. Anybody with a non-Microsoft platform in the mix should understand that constraint before anything else.
Four things that turn a stalled migration into a sequence that finishes.
We take the immediate value first and prove the model
Simply enrolling your existing clients produces Conditional Access with compliance, remote actions, centralized health visibility and modern provisioning, with no workload switched. Delivering that before anything else does three jobs at once: it demonstrates the approach is safe, it gives the business something they can see, and it earns the credibility that the harder workload moves will need later.
We find the unsupported device states before the pilot
Machines that are merely registered rather than properly joined cannot participate, and every estate we have examined contains some. Find them beforehand and you have a known remediation task with a number attached. Find them during the pilot and you have a confusing failure in front of stakeholders. It takes a query, not an investigation.
We sequence workloads by benefit rather than by list order
Compliance goes first as a rule, since Conditional Access is waiting to consume the output. Windows Update follows, because it unlocks Autopatch. Device configuration and client applications come much later, carrying as they do the deepest existing investment and the heaviest packaging burden. The published list is a list, not a running order, and treating it as one is precisely why so many of these projects stall on the difficult workload three weeks in.
We answer the remote device question honestly
The documentation says outright that this does not by itself solve remotely connected Windows machines, because the client still has to reach its assigned site. So if a substantial slice of your estate almost never touches the corporate network, you are looking at either a gateway conversation or a case for moving the affected workloads earlier than planned. Either way we raise it in week one rather than month four.
Six situations where the migration is the right next step.
An estate that works, run by people who like it
The platform does its job, the people running it know it intimately, and nothing is on fire. This is exactly the situation co-management suits, because it adds cloud capability without asking anybody to walk away from something that works, and because workloads then move when the team is genuinely ready rather than when a Gantt chart says they should be.
An organization that needs Conditional Access on Windows devices
This is the trigger we see most often, and it usually arrives from outside, through an insurance questionnaire or a customer security review. Somebody now requires that only compliant machines reach company resources, and Configuration Manager on its own simply cannot feed device compliance into Conditional Access. Enrolling your existing clients supplies exactly that, immediately, before a single workload has moved.
A workforce that stopped coming to the office
Clients have to reach their assigned site, and with a hybrid workforce a great many of them now rarely do. Your options are a gateway or accelerating the update and configuration workloads. What distinguishes this scenario from the others is urgency: here the existing arrangement is not simply dated, it is getting measurably worse every quarter as attendance patterns settle.
A regulated firm needing modern device evidence
When compliance state, device health and patch currency all have to be demonstrated to a SOC 2 auditor, an examiner or an insurer, centralized health visibility with cloud compliance reporting produces a far cleaner answer than a Configuration Manager report the reviewer has never encountered before. Moving compliance first is what relocates that evidence to where the people asking actually expect to find it.
An organization buying new devices and wanting Autopilot
Modern provisioning appears among the immediate benefits, available before any workload moves. If your team is still imaging machines, being able to have a laptop shipped straight from the supplier to somebody home address and configure itself on first boot is usually the single change that carries the business case for the entire program, with no further persuasion required.
A group with more than one Configuration Manager environment
Several instances, usually inherited through acquisitions or left over from regional splits made a decade ago. Since multiple instances can connect to one cloud tenant, you can establish a single consistent management plane across all of them long before anybody takes on the far larger job of consolidating the on-premises environments themselves.
Where organizations with Configuration Manager currently are.
| Feature | Co-managed and progressing | Co-management enabled, nothing moved | Configuration Manager only |
|---|---|---|---|
Conditional Access with device compliance | Yes | Yes | No |
Intune remote actions available | Yes | Yes | No |
Autopilot provisioning available | Yes | Yes | No |
Centralized device health visibility | Yes | Yes | Partly |
Update management modernized | Yes | No | No |
Path to Windows Autopatch open | Yes | No | No |
Configuration delivered without site connectivity | Yes | No | No |
Dependency on on-premises infrastructure reducing | Yes | No | No |
Remote devices manageable without a gateway | Increasingly | No | No |
How common this is | Uncommon | Common | Common |
What each one moves, and where we usually start.
Workload
Compliance policies
- What moving it changes
- Device compliance evaluated by Intune, which is what Conditional Access consumes. Usually first.
Workload
Windows Update policies
- What moving it changes
- Update management moves to Intune, and opens the door to Windows Autopatch.
Workload
Endpoint Protection
- What moving it changes
- Defender policy managed from Intune rather than Configuration Manager.
Workload
Device configuration
- What moving it changes
- Settings and configuration profiles. The largest workload and usually the last of the core ones.
Workload
Resource access policies
- What moving it changes
- Certificate, Wi-Fi, VPN and email profiles delivered from Intune.
Workload
Office Click-to-Run apps
- What moving it changes
- Microsoft 365 Apps deployment and update management moves.
Workload
Client apps
- What moving it changes
- Application deployment. Frequently the one with the most packaging work behind it.
Workload
Everything else
- What moving it changes
- Stays with Configuration Manager, including features co-management does not cover.
Five steps, spread over quarters rather than weeks.
- 1
Assess prerequisites and device state
We check the Configuration Manager version, the directory licensing, whether automatic enrollment is switched on, and above all the device identity position, since merely registered machines cannot participate and finding them is the first thing that has to happen. We also establish whether devices reliably reach their assigned site, because that answer settles the gateway question one way or the other.
- 2
Enable co-management and take the immediate value
Existing clients get enrolled with nothing switched, which delivers Conditional Access with compliance, remote actions, centralized health visibility and modern provisioning. The purpose of this phase is twofold: it proves the approach is safe, and it puts something visible in front of the business before anybody is asked to move a single workload.
- 3
Pilot the first workload
Compliance in most cases, run against a separate collection so the new behavior is exercised on a small population before anybody larger is switched. Note that piloting here is a designed capability rather than something we improvise, and using it as intended is exactly what keeps every step genuinely reversible.
- 4
Move workloads on your own schedule
Windows Update tends to come second, since it opens the road to Autopatch. After that, endpoint protection, resource access, the Office applications, device configuration and client applications, ordered around wherever your existing investment sits. Throughout all of it, everything not yet moved carries on being managed exactly as it always was.
- 5
Decide the end state deliberately
Either fully cloud, or a deliberate long-term hybrid in which Configuration Manager keeps doing whatever it does uniquely well for you. Both are entirely respectable destinations. The thing that causes trouble is drifting into a half-finished arrangement nobody actually selected, which is why we put the question on the table at the beginning and then again once the first workloads have landed.
What organizations ask about moving from Configuration Manager to Intune.
Fifteen questions worth answering first.
Prerequisites
- Are devices Entra joined or hybrid joined?Registered-only devices are not supported.
- Do you have Entra ID P1 or P2?A stated licensing prerequisite.
- Is your Configuration Manager version supported?A supported current branch version is required.
- Is Windows automatic enrollment enabled?Part of the Intune setup prerequisites.
- Do you have devices that never reach the site?That is a cloud management gateway question.
Sequencing
- Which workload delivers most for least disruption?Usually compliance policies.
- Which collection would you pilot with?Piloting is per workload and per collection.
- Is Windows Autopatch in the plan?It follows the Windows Update workload moving.
- How much application packaging sits behind client apps?Usually the largest single piece of work.
- Are there workloads you never intend to move?A legitimate answer, and worth recording.
The end state
- Is the goal cloud-only, or a stable hybrid?Both are valid. Deciding matters.
- What does Configuration Manager still do uniquely for you?Frequently more than people expect.
- Who has Configuration Manager full administrator rights?Required to enable co-management.
- Do you have more than one Configuration Manager instance?Multiple can connect to one Intune tenant.
- Who reviews the co-management dashboard?It shows which machines are actually co-managed.
The pages around this one.
Microsoft Intune
The destination platform, covering enrollment, configuration profiles, compliance and application deployment.
Windows Autopilot
Modern provisioning, listed among the immediate benefits of co-management and usually the most visible one.
Windows Autopatch
Where update management goes once the Windows Update workload has moved to Intune.
Start with the phase that requires you to move nothing.
Enrolling existing Configuration Manager clients delivers Conditional Access with device compliance, remote actions and Autopilot provisioning without switching a single workload. It proves the model is safe and it is usually the business case for everything that follows.
Related Services
Explore more solutions that work great with this service