We value your privacy

We use cookies to analyze site traffic and improve your experience. You can accept all cookies or reject non-essential ones. See our Privacy Policy for details.

GR IT SERVICES
  • Contact
Get a quote
  1. Microsoft Intune
  2. Mobile Threat Defense
Mobile Threat Defense

Let the connector go quiet for long enough and Intune simply stops enforcing the compliance state at all.

This feeds device risk into your compliance policies, into Conditional Access and into app protection, and it reaches devices nobody ever enrolled. A genuinely useful control, carrying one property everybody should know about: a connector that goes unresponsive and unnoticed means the risk signal quietly stops counting for anything.

Book a mobile threat reviewSee how the risk signal works
Mobile Threat Defense integration with Intune for US organizations
  • 17 partnersListed by Microsoft, plus Defender
  • Low, medium, highRisk levels compared to your allowance
  • Unenrolled tooThrough app protection policies
  • One per platformMicrosoft recommendation on vendors
The failure mode to design around

A connector that stops responding stops protecting anything, and nothing anywhere tells you.

This is the property that separates a mobile threat defense deployment that works from one that provides false assurance.

  • Six states are documented: unavailable, not set up, available, enabled, unresponsive and error. Operationally the one that matters is unresponsive, where the connector has stopped answering without having actually failed.
  • Let that state persist past the configured day threshold and Intune stops paying attention to the compliance state altogether. What that means in practice is that phones stop being assessed for risk, compliance stops reflecting any of it, and Conditional Access stops acting on it, with nothing visibly broken anywhere.
  • The company carries on believing that mobile risk is feeding its access decisions. It is not. And because nothing technically failed, no ticket gets raised and no alert fires unless somebody deliberately built one.
  • The remedy is simple and has to be deliberate. Watch connector status as an operational item, choose the unresponsive threshold consciously rather than inheriting whatever number was there, and give one person responsibility for noticing. An hour to arrange, and it is the whole difference between having a control and merely believing you have one.
Ask us to review your connector health
How it works

Eight things that decide whether any of this actually protects a phone.

The problem is framed plainly enough. Companies work hard at protecting laptops from attack while the phones go entirely unmonitored, and mobile platforms remain vulnerable to a sophisticated attack regardless of how well the operating system isolates applications from one another.

A risk level, compared to an allowance you set

The application on the phone scans and reports back to its vendor, the threat is rated low, medium or high, and that rating gets compared against whatever risk allowance you set in Intune. Depending on the comparison, access to resources is withdrawn for as long as the device stays compromised. That is the entire mechanism, and it means the allowance you configured is the real control here rather than the scanning.

The unresponsive connector, which silently stops enforcement

Six connector states are documented, and one of them deserves your attention: unresponsive. Once the connector has been unresponsive for the number of days set in the corresponding threshold, Intune stops paying attention to the compliance state entirely. So the control fails open, silently, after a number somebody configured and almost certainly does not remember. Watching connector status is not an optional refinement.

It works on devices you do not manage

The same data works on devices nobody enrolled, by way of app protection policies, so company data inside a protected application can still be defended and a block or a selective wipe still issued. For a workforce where most mobile access happens on personal phones nobody is ever going to enroll, that extends the control to precisely the population it normally cannot reach.

One vendor per platform, and Microsoft explains why

Stick to one vendor per tenant per platform. More than one is technically supported for compliance purposes, but run two on the same platform and every device there has to carry both applications and scan with both, and a single failure to submit from either one marks the device non-compliant. Defender for Endpoint sits outside that recommendation.

Enhanced permissions on managed Android, for one partner

On fully managed and corporate-owned Android devices you can grant your chosen partner enhanced permissions, exempting their application from being suspended, hibernated, power-restricted or interfered with by the person holding the phone, so protection carries on uninterrupted. Those permissions go to one partner at a time, which reinforces the point about sticking to a single vendor per platform.

Data sharing is opt-in and off by default

Two inventory sharing services exist for Apple mobile devices, one covering applications and one covering certificates, and both are opt-in with nothing shared until an administrator explicitly enables them. Since both reach personally owned phones as well as company ones, that default is the correct one, and changing it deserves an actual conversation rather than somebody clicking a toggle.

Certificate inventory, supported by exactly one partner

Certificate sync lets a supported partner ask about the certificates installed on an enrolled Apple mobile device, sharing the account and device identifiers, who owns the device, and a list of certificates including the common name and whether each is an identity. Exactly one partner is listed as supporting it. If that capability matters to you, it narrows the vendor choice down considerably.

Seventeen partners, and one of them covers Windows too

Seventeen products in total, from Better Mobile and BlackBerry through Check Point, CrowdStrike, iVerify and Jamf, then Lookout, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Pradeo, SentinelOne and Sophos, then Symantec, Trellix, Trend Micro, Trustd, the Windows Security Center and Zimperium. Nearly all of them handle both Android and Apple mobile devices. Defender for Endpoint is the only one reaching Windows as well.

How we approach it

Four things that keep this from becoming an assumption.

This is a good control carrying a genuinely unusual failure mode, and almost everything determining whether it succeeds happens after deployment rather than during it.

Connector health becomes an operational item on the first day

Because a connector left unresponsive past the configured threshold means Intune disregards the compliance state entirely, and nothing about that failure is visible to anybody who is not deliberately looking. We choose the threshold on purpose, put the connector status somewhere it will actually be seen, and name the person responsible for noticing. An hour of work, and it is what turns the deployment into something real.

We settle the vendor question before configuring anything

One vendor per tenant per platform is the recommendation, and the cost of ignoring it is spelled out: every device on that platform has to install every configured application and scan with all of them, and any one of them failing to submit marks the device non-compliant. Companies already owning two mobile security products need to pick one rather than deploying both and hoping.

We extend it to unenrolled devices deliberately

That same threat data drives app protection policies on devices nobody enrolled, allowing a block or a selective wipe of company data inside a protected application. Across most American workforces that unenrolled group is the larger of the two, and it is the half most companies leave entirely uncovered because they assume this needs enrollment to work at all.

We treat the inventory sharing decision as a decision

Both inventory sharing services are opt-in and off until somebody enables them, and both reach personally owned phones as well as company ones. Handing a third-party vendor a list of the applications on an employee personal phone is a privacy decision rather than a configuration toggle, and the state privacy laws are reason enough to treat it as one. We raise it explicitly so the decision gets made rather than discovered afterward.

Where this matters most

Six US situations where mobile threat risk is worth acting on.

The framing in the documentation fits this well. Companies protect their computers meticulously and leave the phones entirely unwatched, while a growing share of the actual work happens on those phones.

Executives and high-value targets on mobile

Senior people reading sensitive material on a phone, traveling constantly, joining networks nobody vetted, and worth targeting specifically because of who they are. Spotting a network open to interception or a malicious application, rating it, and withdrawing access for as long as the device stays compromised is aimed squarely at exactly this group.

A workforce on personal devices you cannot enroll

Where app protection already covers the data and nothing whatsoever assesses the phone underneath it. Feeding threat risk into those policies means a compromised personal device can be blocked outright, or have the company data selectively wiped out of it, which closes the single gap unenrolled protection otherwise leaves standing open.

A regulated firm asked about mobile security

When an insurer, a SOC 2 auditor, a HIPAA risk assessment or a large customer asks how the phones are protected, jailbreak detection on its own is a thin answer that invites a follow-up question. Graded risk from a recognized vendor, feeding compliance and Conditional Access, with the ability to withdraw access for as long as a device is compromised, is a far stronger position and it generates evidence as it goes.

A managed Android fleet where the security app keeps getting shut down

Android suspends and hibernates applications aggressively in the name of battery life, which is precisely the wrong instinct where a security agent is concerned. On fully managed and corporate-owned devices, the enhanced permissions exempt that application from suspension, hibernation, power restrictions and interference by the person holding the phone, so the protection genuinely keeps running.

An organization already paying for a mobile security product

A good many of those seventeen are products companies already own for entirely unrelated reasons, Check Point, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Sophos, Trellix, Trend Micro and Jamf among them. Connecting something you already have to Intune so that its risk signal starts driving access decisions is very often a configuration exercise rather than anything requiring a purchase order.

A mixed estate wanting one answer across platforms

Defender for Endpoint is the only entry on that list reaching Android, Apple mobile and Windows all at once. For a company already committed to the Defender family, using it as the mobile source as well keeps the signal, the console and the licensing together rather than adding another vendor relationship to manage.

Three positions

What organizations actually know about threats on their mobile devices.

The middle column, relying on jailbreak and root detection through compliance policy alone, is the most common position and it catches one narrow category of problem and nothing else.
Jailbroken and rooted devices detected
Mobile Threat DefenseYes
Basic compliance checksYes
NothingNo
Malicious applications detected
Mobile Threat DefenseYes
Basic compliance checksNo
NothingNo
Network attacks detected
Mobile Threat DefenseYes
Basic compliance checksNo
NothingNo
Risk graded and compared to an allowance
Mobile Threat DefenseYes
Basic compliance checksNo
NothingNo
Access revoked while a device is compromised
Mobile Threat DefenseYes
Basic compliance checksPartly
NothingNo
Covers unenrolled personal devices
Mobile Threat DefenseYes
Basic compliance checksNo
NothingNo
Continuous protection on managed Android
Mobile Threat DefenseYes
Basic compliance checksNot applicable
NothingNo
Selective wipe possible on a compromised device
Mobile Threat DefenseYes
Basic compliance checksPartly
NothingNo
Somebody monitors whether it is still working
Mobile Threat DefenseShould be
Basic compliance checksNot applicable
NothingNot applicable
Answers a mobile security question with evidence
Mobile Threat DefenseYes
Basic compliance checksThinly
NothingNo
Feature
Mobile Threat Defense
Basic compliance checks
Nothing
Jailbroken and rooted devices detected
YesYesNo
Malicious applications detected
YesNoNo
Network attacks detected
YesNoNo
Risk graded and compared to an allowance
YesNoNo
Access revoked while a device is compromised
YesPartlyNo
Covers unenrolled personal devices
YesNoNo
Continuous protection on managed Android
YesNot applicableNo
Selective wipe possible on a compromised device
YesPartlyNo
Somebody monitors whether it is still working
Should beNot applicableNot applicable
Answers a mobile security question with evidence
YesThinlyNo
Connector states

What each state actually means, and whether anything is being protected.

Taken from the published status table. The distinction worth holding onto is which of these states stops threat messages and which lets them through unexamined.

State

Enabled

What it means
Configured, with at least one platform switched on. This is the one you want.

State

Available

What it means
Configured, but with no platform switched on. Nothing whatsoever is being assessed.

State

Not Set Up

What it means
Not finished. Further steps or permissions are needed either in Intune or at the vendor end.

State

Unavailable

What it means
Deprovisioned entirely. The vendor has to reach out to Intune before it exists again.

State

Unresponsive

What it means
Silent. Once past the day threshold you configured, Intune disregards the compliance state completely.

State

Error

What it means
An error code, which some vendors send and others do not bother with.
StateWhat it means
EnabledConfigured, with at least one platform switched on. This is the one you want.
AvailableConfigured, but with no platform switched on. Nothing whatsoever is being assessed.
Not Set UpNot finished. Further steps or permissions are needed either in Intune or at the vendor end.
UnavailableDeprovisioned entirely. The vendor has to reach out to Intune before it exists again.
UnresponsiveSilent. Once past the day threshold you configured, Intune disregards the compliance state completely.
ErrorAn error code, which some vendors send and others do not bother with.
How a deployment runs

Five steps, and the final one never finishes because it is not a milestone.

Two to four weeks as a rule. Setting up the connector is quick work. Choosing the vendor, settling the risk thresholds and deciding who watches the connector afterward is what determines whether any of it holds.
  1. 1

    Choose the vendor, once, per platform

    Weighing what you already own, whether Windows needs covering, whether certificate inventory matters to you, and the recommendation of one vendor per tenant per platform. Configure two for a single platform and every device there runs both applications, with a failed scan from either one marking it non-compliant.

  2. 2

    Connect and confirm the connector reaches Enabled

    Configured, with at least one platform switched on, which is what moves the status from available to enabled. Anything short of that leaves you with a connector that exists and assesses precisely nothing, and companies sit in that state for far longer than they realize.

  3. 3

    Set the risk allowance and the enforcement path

    Deciding which risk level you will tolerate, whether low, medium or high, and what happens above it. For enrolled devices that means being marked non-compliant and Conditional Access acting on it. For unenrolled ones it means an app protection action, whether a block or a selective wipe. Where both populations exist, both paths need configuring.

  4. 4

    Decide the optional data sharing explicitly

    Both inventory sharing services for Apple mobile devices are opt-in, off until enabled, and reach personally owned phones alongside company ones. That makes each a privacy decision for the company rather than a technical default, and it should be taken deliberately and written down somewhere.

  5. 5

    Make connector health somebody's responsibility

    The unresponsive threshold chosen deliberately, the connector status displayed somewhere a human will actually see it, and one person named as the owner. Because beyond that threshold Intune disregards the compliance state entirely, while the company carries on believing mobile risk is driving its access decisions.

Straight answers

What organizations ask about Mobile Threat Defense.

The vendor application scans the phone, analyzes what it finds and passes that to Intune. The worked example given is an application reporting that a phone has joined a network open to interception. The threat gets rated low, medium or high, that rating is compared against the risk allowance you configured, and access can be withdrawn for as long as the device remains compromised.

No, and that is among its more useful properties. The same data serves as a source for unenrolled devices by way of app protection policies, letting company data inside a protected application be defended and a block or a selective wipe issued. For any company whose staff flatly refuse to enroll their personal phones, that extends the control to precisely the group it usually cannot touch.

Specific, and worth designing around rather than discovering. There is a documented unresponsive connector state, and once it has persisted past the configured day threshold, Intune disregards the compliance state. So the control fails open rather than closed, and it does so silently, while the company carries on believing mobile risk is being enforced somewhere.

Technically yes for compliance purposes, and the recommendation is firmly against it. Stick to one vendor per tenant per platform. Configure two or more for the same platform and every device there must install each application and scan with all of them, and any single application failing to submit a scan marks that device non-compliant. Defender for Endpoint is exempted from the recommendation.

Seventeen are listed, running from Better Mobile and BlackBerry through Check Point, CrowdStrike, iVerify and Jamf, then Lookout, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Pradeo, SentinelOne and Sophos, then Symantec, Trellix, Trend Micro, Trustd, the Windows Security Center and Zimperium. Most handle Android alongside Apple mobile devices. Defender for Endpoint is alone in also covering Windows.

For a great many companies it is the obvious answer, and it is treated slightly differently from the other partners. It is the only entry reaching Android, Apple mobile and Windows together. It sits outside the one vendor per platform recommendation, so it can run alongside another vendor product with compliance checked separately through policies aimed at different groups. And on Android it can be configured to launch by itself during device setup.

Because Android suspends, hibernates and power-restricts applications with real determination, which comprehensively defeats a security agent. On fully managed and corporate-owned devices you can grant your partner enhanced permissions through the connector, exempting their application from suspension, hibernation, power restrictions and interference from the person holding the phone, so protection continues uninterrupted. Those permissions go to exactly one partner at a time.

By default, threat information and nothing else. Two further inventory sharing services exist for Apple mobile devices, one covering applications and one covering certificates, and both are opt-in with nothing shared until an administrator turns them on. Both reach personally owned phones alongside company ones, so enabling either across a population that includes personal devices is a decision worth taking consciously, particularly for a workforce spread across states with comprehensive privacy laws.

The published list covers the application identifier, its version and short version, the name, and both bundle and dynamic size, plus flags recording whether it was ad hoc code signed, installed from the store, a beta build distributed through TestFlight, or a volume purchase tied to the device, along with whether it is validated and whether it is managed. Inventories arrive at each device check-in, from personally owned phones as well as company ones.

Jailbreak and root detection is a single narrow signal that somebody has fundamentally modified the operating system. This covers a far wider set, including malicious applications, network attacks and whatever else the vendor detects, graded into a risk level rather than reported as a yes or no. Both are worth having. One tells you a device has been tampered with. The other tells you a device is under attack right now.

That depends on how you configured it and on whether the phone was ever enrolled. For an enrolled device the compliance state changes and Conditional Access acts on that, cutting off access to resources for as long as the device stays compromised and restoring it once the problem is dealt with. For an unenrolled one, app protection policy either blocks access to company data inside protected applications or wipes that data selectively out of them.

Connectors for Android and Apple mobile devices are available in the higher US government cloud and in the China environment, provided the vendor themselves supports those, and you can see which connectors are available once signed into your own tenant. For a defense contractor or anybody else operating in the government cloud for CMMC reasons, confirming vendor support for that environment belongs inside the selection decision rather than arriving as an unpleasant discovery afterward.

Yes, and you genuinely should. The application deploys and targets like any other, and both the compliance policies and the app protection policies consuming its signal are aimed at groups. Beginning with the population where the value is most obvious, which usually means executives, finance, or anybody handling sensitive material on a phone, gives you something working before anybody attempts a broad rollout. Commercially each engagement is scoped on its own, according to which vendor gets selected, whether unenrolled devices are in scope, and whether you want the ongoing connector monitoring handled as a managed item. Vendor licensing is separate and stated separately. What costs nothing in the first conversation is checking whether you already own one of those seventeen products, which considerably more companies do than realize it.
Before deploying

Fifteen questions worth answering first.

The first block covers choosing a vendor. The second covers configuring it. The third covers what actually happens afterward, which is where this particular control tends to decay without anybody noticing for months.

Vendor selection

  • Do you already have a mobile security product?
    Several vendors on the list are ones organizations already own.
  • Do you need Windows coverage as well?
    Defender for Endpoint appears against Android, Apple mobile and Windows alike.
  • Do you need certificate inventory?
    Microsoft lists one partner supporting it.
  • Are you running Jamf for Apple already?
    Jamf Mobile Threat Defense is on the partner list.
  • Are you tempted to run two vendors?
    Microsoft recommends one per tenant per platform.

Configuration

  • What risk level should block access?
    Low, medium or high, compared with your allowance.
  • Are unenrolled devices in scope?
    App protection policies can consume the same signal.
  • Should the Android enhanced permissions be granted?
    One partner at a time, on managed Android.
  • Do you want application inventory sharing?
    Opt-in, and it covers personal devices too.
  • Do you want certificate inventory sharing?
    Also opt-in, and supported by one partner.

Operations

  • Who monitors connector status?
    Unresponsive for long enough means enforcement stops.
  • What is the unresponsive day threshold set to?
    Set it deliberately rather than inheriting it.
  • What happens when a device is flagged?
    Block, selective wipe, or a conversation.
  • Who tells the user why they are blocked?
    The Company Portal can, if configured.
  • Does anybody review the threat findings?
    A blocked phone is telling you something, not merely producing an outcome.
Related reading

The pages around this one.

Microsoft Intune

Where device risk becomes a compliance state: enrollment, compliance policies and the tenant settings that decide whether that state is enforced.

Learn more

Defender for Endpoint

The Microsoft option, and the only partner on the list reaching Android, Apple mobile and Windows at once.

Learn more

Endpoint security

The wider endpoint practice across platforms, and where mobile fits alongside laptops and servers.

Learn more
Next step

Check your connector status, and the unresponsive threshold behind it.

If a connector is anything other than enabled, it is assessing nothing. If it has been unresponsive past the configured threshold, Intune has stopped acting on the compliance state entirely. Both are two-minute checks with significant consequences.

Book a mobile threat reviewSee Microsoft Intune

Related Services

Explore more solutions that work great with this service

Microsoft Intune

Device management and endpoint security

Learn more

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Services

EDR plan selection, onboarding and zero-gap AV migration

Learn more

Endpoint Security

Endpoint security for US businesses using Microsoft Defender for

Learn more

Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Design

Conditional Access design and review for US organizations:

Learn more

Microsoft Security Services

The Microsoft security stack deployed and managed end to end

Learn more

Microsoft Defender

Advanced endpoint and email threat protection

Learn more
GR IT SERVICES

IT services for US businesses,
delivering enterprise-grade solutions
remotely, coast to coast.

Microsoft CSP PartnerApple Jamf PartnerCISGuard

Microsoft 365

  • Microsoft 365 Administration
  • M365 Reporting & Auditing
  • Microsoft 365 Licensing
  • Microsoft Copilot
  • Microsoft 365 Apps
  • Windows 365 Cloud PC
  • Microsoft SharePoint
  • Outlook & Exchange

Security

  • Microsoft Defender
  • Microsoft Purview
  • Microsoft Intune
  • Microsoft Entra
  • Compliance Manager
  • Cybersecurity Audits
  • Copilot for Security
  • Microsoft Sentinel
  • Microsoft Priva

Infrastructure

  • Google Workspace
  • Cloud Migration Services
  • Data Analytics & BI
  • Active Directory
  • Server Management
  • Apple Business
  • Apple Jamf Pro
  • IP Telephone
  • Data Backup
  • Website Development

IT Services

  • Managed IT Services
  • IT Support USA
  • IT AMC USA
  • New Office IT Setup
  • IT Relocation
  • Remote IT Support
  • On-Call IT Support
  • Startup IT Business Kit
  • Disaster Recovery & BC

Company

  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Blog

Contact

  • hello@gritservices.io
  • gritservices.io

© 2026 GR IT Services. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie PolicyCCPA/CPRA